John asks…
What’s the best Digital SLR camera for around $1000?
I am looking for a good quality Digital SLR camera for around $1000. If possible, I want to purchase one that comes with 2 lenses (sometimes Best Buy and Circuit City sell the SLR‘s in kits.) What is a good lens for close-ups (?55mm-300mm?)? And what is a good one for wide angle shots?
I also would like to know if any of the SLR ‘s use regular SD memory cards or if you have to buy those expensive high speed ones.
Also, the camera has to take at least 5 frames per second. I will be using it to take fast action shots.
It should also have between 8-10 megapixels.
Do you own a Digital SLR…if so, what kind…do you like it/would you recommend it?
I have heard that Canon makes the best, but I am not completely set on buying a Canon …I am open to more suggestions.
Any websites, information, pricing guides, or product review sites would be great! Thanks!
Also, if I want to take close-ups…is a 75-300mm lens good, or should I spring for something more in the 500-1300mm range? I know they get a whole heck of a lot pricier when you get past 300mm. What is a good lens to purchase that is in the 75-300mm range…and about how much should that cost. (And I would prefer it to be auto focus rather than manual.)
rob answers:
Given your budget, this is what I would do:
Go to www.bhphotovideo.com and check out their used department. Consider a used 20d (just body) for a hair over $700. This is a pro-grade camera, and will meet your 5fps quota. It will also be more durable than the consumer-grade versions (dig rebels). It is a superb camera and a good deal at that price. B&H is a reputable dealer and I wouldn’t hesitate to buy their used products.
Be aware that digital SLR cameras (other than big $ ones like the 5d) have sensors that are bigger than those of point-and-shoot digicams, but smaller than film. This means that it takes fewer megapixels than a point-and shoot to make a certain sized enlargement. It also means, though, that your lenses will actually reach further on a “crop body” D-SLR than they will on a film camera. For the 20d and similar cameras, multiply the focal length by 1.6x to get the effective length. This means that your longer lenses reach further, but that you have to go even shorter to get true “wide angle.”
All Canon digital SLR’s use compact-flash chips.
Now here is an unpleasant truth: the “kit” lenses that come with these cameras range in quality from mediocre to downright rubbish. Unfortunately, the same is true for the the “consumer grade” 70-300mm zooms available at Bestbuy and the like. If you really want one, look on B&H, Adorama, or any of the other major site’s used sections. They usually go for $100, as they are commonly sold back when people realize that they don’t deliver on quality. You will find these lenses typically lack the sharpness and contrasty color that one associates with a serious D-SLR setup. Why spend that much on a fancy camera, only to look through cheap glass? If you want to read about lenses, go to www.photozone.de and the reviews page on www.fredmiranda.com.
The single best lens to get for your new canon D-SLR is the 50mm f/1.8 prime lens. This lens is fixed at a “medium” range, 90mm effectively on your 20d or the like. It will not zoom. However, it takes BEAUTIFUL pictures. It is also VERY fast (if you’re getting this camera, read up on how f-stops relate to shooting under different conditions). You will be able to shoot in low light with no flash. This lens is $70 new. Its a steal. Run, don’t walk.
The bad news is that the 50mm prime is a rarity in providing that image quality at an affordable price. For wide angle, look at the Tokina 19-35mm f/3.5-4.5 ($150 give or take). This is generally considered the cheapest good WA out there. Be aware that it will only be moderately wide on the 20d, but lower than 19mm starts getting pricey. This isn’t pro quality, but its good.
Long range isn’t cheap. The best “cheap” option is the 100-300mm f/4.5-5.6 ($250). This lens is kind of slow (high f-stop numbers), but it will produce better images than its 70-300mm brother. Its still not great, though. The best deal in tele-zooms is the Canon 70-200mm f/4L. This is an “L” series (pro grade) lens that takes knockout pictures. It runs about $550, and would shoot at 112-320mm on a 20d or equivalent. The added benefit is this lens works suprisingly well with a 1.4 tele-extender. Adding one of these between the camera and lens will multiply your effective range to 448mm at the cost of a few f-stops and a *small* bit of resolution. You can’t usually get away with using an extender on a zoom lens while still making good quality, but this is an exception.
Also worth considering is the 70-300mm 4-5.6 *IS* (not to be confused with the non-IS). This is an image stabilized lens, and much better quality optics than the non-IS. This runs about $550 as well.
If you honestly need the range, but can’t increase your budget to buy the L series or the IS, then I would think long and hard about a used Canon 10d, which is still an excellent camera capable of producing lovely 8×10′s. These often go for $400 or less on the fredmiranda.com for-sale bulletins and similar places. Once again, don’t buy a fancy camera only to skimp on the glass. For what its worth, I own a 10d that I love to death, and I’m far more interested in upgrading my lenses than that body.
In the end, choosing lenses is about what you are going to do with them. If you are shooting indoor sports, for instance, nothing slower than the expensive f/2.8 lenses will do very well. If you are shooting wildlife, 300mm is usually a START for the range you need, not the end. If you provide more information on those action shots, I can probably cater my recommendations better.
So, to recap this novel:
1. I need a $1000 starter camera setup:
-Used 20d ($720)
-2gb Compact Flash ($50)
-Canon 50mm f/1.8 ($70)
-Tokina 19-35mm f3.5-4.5 ($150)
2. I need range and my price is flexible
-Add 70-200mm f/4 ($550) to above
3. I need range and price is not (very) flexible
-Subtract 20d and replace with used 10d
George asks…
Good reasonable priced Canon DSLR/SLR?
I want to get a Canon DSLR camera because I’m getting increasingly interested in photography and want to get a good camera to take pictures with. I’m currently using my iPhone 4 which has flash and auto focus, it’s great and takes good pictures but it’s not very friendly on the battery life!
I’m 15 years old and want to take Photography as a college course. I’ve been looking at a college and their photography course and what it requires. It says I will need a digital camera and an SLR camera.
Would it be better to get a DSLR or SLR camera? I was thinking of getting the Canon EOS 1000D because of its price and I’ve looked at reviews and they’re all positive feedback.
Would you be able to give me any information about which camera(s) would be suitable and if DSLR or SLR camera would work better? Thanks (:
rob answers:
Well it really depends on what you call reasonably priced, I have friends who are willing to spend ÂŁ3000 on equipment. Even I will happily spend ÂŁ600 on a second hand camera.
If you’re studying a photography course it’s likely that you will require a film SLR camera, as well as a digital camera of some description (whether it’s a digital SLR or a digital compact/bridge is not so important).
I think for your needs you should look at a Nikon FE2 with AI 50mm lens. And also a second hand D200.
Jenny asks…
Best small digital SLR camera?
Hi, I’m looking for a smaller sized digital SLR camera. One that takes professional photos, but is still small enough for a 15 year old to take around wherever I go.
Something like the Canon Powershot SX210 IS, but I really need some opinions on what the best SLR camera is to you.
What I’m looking for: Image quality is most important to me, followed by good features like colour accent mode, black and white, sepia and such. And (I forget what you call this), but I want to be able to take multiple photos within milliseconds.. shutter speed I think?
Anyway, yeah. Basically I’m looking for a nice, small digital SLR camera that has really professional image quality. preferably under ~ $900. Reviews would be great…thanks in advance!:)

rob answers:
Well the Nikon D90 is a very good camera (it’s not necessarily a beginner camera) but it is selling new for around $900.
It’s less than 2 pounds (25.2 ounces) which is very light for such a high end camera
Susan asks…
i have a million questions about digital and film slr cameras…?
ok so im only 14, and i have this really crappy digital canon camera, and it recently broke -.-
so my price rang is up to 500$ but i would love it if it below.
im looking for a camera that is easy to use, but takes really great clear pictures, i know part of that is just holding the camera still, good lighting, but i don’t want a fuzzy pictures, as clear as possible would be nice.
i have an old film camera, but its really hard to use, and its heavy, plus im not aloud to take it anywhere because i got it from my uncle who passed away.
therefore i have tons of stuff for film cameras including film
and batteries.
i have 2 removable lenses. and they both have some sort of filter on both. so i want a camera where i can remove the different lenses and put others on.
also i have all the stuff for digital cameras to.
so, i don’t no if i want SLR or DSLR..
but i do know that a want to be able to review my photos on the camera.. so i think that has to be DSLR, right?
i was looking at this camera is it any good?
http://www.nikon.ca/en/Product.aspx?m=17040
i am also the kind of person who brings their camera EVERYWHERE. i wouldn’t drop it, it wouldn’t fall in water or anything -.- i tend to be overly protective of my cameras:)
anyways, i really don’t know what i want, so recommend things please
i have a canon lense and a sigma lense. do differnt lenses need differnt cameras? ’cause those 2 are differnt and work fine for the canon . but could i use both on the nikon?
i dont know what EF means…
and is canon relieble?
yes, that is pretty priceless
yes, that is pretty priceless
the sigma lense is 70-210mm
and the canon is 28-80mm
the modle of the camera is a canon eos reble x ..
thanks casperskitty!!!

rob answers:
Which canon and sigma lenses do you have? What are the focal lengths? For example, 18-55mm, 70-300mm. It will say on the ring on the front of the lenses. Then, which model is the old camera you aren’t allowed to take out of the house? If the canon the lenses fit it not an eos series camera, and then those lenses wouldn’t fit any of the ef-mount lenses.
Okay. It is like this: each camera system has a different mount. The current mount for the canon system is the ef-mount. If the lenses you have are designated ef, then they will work on an eos canon SLR, digital or 35mm.
Here is a chart of the 35mm Canon EOS models, what level they are and when they were made:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canon_EOS_50
Scroll down just a bit and you will see the chart. If the canon that fits the lenses is on this chart, then they are ef-mount lenses. If they are good lenses, then my advice would be to stay with canon. I will give you more info when you update with the specifics from the lenses and the camera.
Edit-Okay, I checked for you and from what I have been told the 28-80 is basically a kit lens. Okay, but cheaply made. The 70-210 however is a pretty decent lens. So, I would say it is up to you whether you stay with canon or switch brands. If you do stay with canon, will you be allowed to use the 70-210 lens? If so, then maybe you should. But if not, then now is the time to do some major research and decide which brand you would like the best.
Personally, I am in the process of switching to Sony/Minolta. I like the ergonomics. I like that I can find Minolta lenses to use with the Sonys.
But I would really research because once you decide on a brand, you will be building a system that can only be used with that brand of camera bodies.
I think someone may have linked you here already, but it deserves a second plug:
http://www.dpreview.com/
It really helped me make my final decision on which camera I wanted to go with.

Mary asks…
How do i know if a SLR camera has good features? I need good Color control & Extended dynamic range?
How do i know if a SLR camera has good features? I need good Color control & Extended dynamic range?
I’m looking at buying either the
http://www.digital-slr-guide.com/canon-rebel-xti-guide.html
or the
http://www.digital-slr-guide.com/canon-rebel-xsi-guide.html
they both have great reviews , i wanted the canon 40D but the review suggest one of the other 2 i mentioned if i didn’t want to get too technical- i need one which is good for outdoors, land scape and night maybe, i am goign to europe so i want a really good one, not to fussy and one which i can count on for great pictures all time of the day and night.
any suggestions?
rob answers:
If you are considering the Canon XTi and XSi, take a look at the Canon Ti (500D). It is about the same price as the XTi or XSi but instead of having the Digic III processor it has the new Digic IV processor. It also has a higher megapixel sensor, not to mention a lot more features than the two. I would also take a look at the Nikon D90, which for your budget is probably the class leader in terms of picture quality. Everyone would love to have the Nikon D3, but at almost $4,000.00 for the body, it is quite expensive. The D300 is a little more affordable but still cost about $1,800.00 for the body alone. The new Pentax K-7 ($1,300.00 body) seems to offer a lot for the money with nice features like full magnesium body, weather & environmental sealing, 100% viewfinder view, multiple manual control options, and is one the most compact and lightest DSLR’s on the market. Check out the links below for good reviews of all three cameras. Especially check out Section 4. Body & Design of the K-7 review for a great picture comparing the physical size of Canon, Nikon, and Olympus cameras against the Pentax K-7. In terms of cost the K-7 is about in the middle of the Ti D90 and D300.
Powered by Yahoo! Answers







