Nancy asks…
thinking about the canon 7d. best all purpose lens to get?
I have been going back and forth about a digital slr camera to get for a while now. i had been considering the canon 50 and nikon d90 (however most emphasis was on the 50d). i have been thinking and i feel like i should come up with the extra cashola and do the 7d body only (better processor, new technology, 18mp, 8fms, 1080p recording). this will however limit my lens choice. so i will only be able to get one lens for the time being if i get this camera body. any suggestions on a good all around canon lens without going over $500 (since i will still have to get a few other accessories and cant spend much more). thanks for the ideas. or should i go with the cheaper body and sacrifice all the goodies?
rob answers:
Hey, great choice of a camera. This one will last you a lifetime. I’d look at a zoom lens that goes from wide angle to telephoto. Canon has one at a great price, the Canon EF 28-200mm f/3.5-5.6 USM Standard Zoom Lens for about $375 at Amazon.
Paul asks…
Photographers/Camera Enthusiasts………?
I am buying my first DSLR and want to start with a decent one.
Does this sound like a good deal to you?
Item Specifics
Brand:Canon
Title:Canon EOS 450D 12.2 Megapixel Digital Camera Body Only
Memory Card Format:SDHC Card
Model:Canon EOS 450D 12.2 Megapixel Digital Camera Body Only
Digital Camera Type:SLR, Professional
Battery Type:Rechargeable Li-Ion Battery
Items including in the sale are:
- Canon 450d dslr body with another 2 years warranty from Canon Australia for peace of mind.
 (bought in Sep. 2008 from Digital Camera Warehouse in Sydney with 3 years extended warranty)
 It has taken about 7,000 shots (it is rated to take 100,000 shots)
-Tamron 17-50mm f2.8 lens , delivers very good quality photosÂ
 Read the review here http://www.the-digital-picture.com/reviews/tamron-17-50mm-f-2.8-xr-di-ii-lens-review.aspx
- Canon 55-250mm f4-5.6 IS lens, a good telephoto lens
 Read the review here http://www.the- digital -picture.com/reviews/ canon -ef-s-55-250mm-f-4-5.6-is-lens-review.aspx
Reason for selling is I upgraded to Full Frame Camera.
All items are in excellent condition like new. I can’t see any scratches on them.
Manual,cables,battery,charger,receipt and software are included .
I will also include Hoya and Cokin filters for the lens,4gb memory and shutter remote at no extra cost.
Brand new will cost you more than $1500 so don’t miss out!
FOR AUSTRALIAN BUYERS ONLY .
Its $800 and 30 postage.
Sorry for the length but I just copied it. I want to buy one with a warranty FOR SURE and will be buying from eBay regardless of what anyone thinks haha.
rob answers:
I buy used camera gear all the time. I purchased a used lens for aud 850 just last month. In the last 12 months, I’ve probably purchased aud 2000 worth of used camera gear from eBay and similar sites. So far, I’ve never had a problem.
I did a quick conversion of the 800 asking price to euros (my own currency) and that seems like a very good price. Particularly since it’s my understanding that camera manufacturers overcharge in Australia.
The 450D is two years and two generations old, but still a very fine first dSLR. Here’s a review from back then – the pros and cons mostly still hold true: http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canoneos450d/page34.asp With the newer versions you get a few more megapixels (that you probably don’t need), movie recording which could come in handy, and a few other tiny improvements, but nothing that makes for a vastly better camera… For that you’d have to transition to Canon’s next line up: the old 40D, 50D, or new 60D.
To the best of my knowledge, a Canon warranty won’t transfer. Not unless the original owner never registered his gear with Canon – in that case you could do so. So if you absolutely, positively want a warranty, this is something to investigate.
The Tamron lens is the item that makes this deal so good. It’s vastly better than the kit lens. Optically, it actually comes very close to Canon’s 17-55mm f/2.8, which costs 2 to 3 times more.
The 55-250mm lens is nothing special, but the extended zoom range along with the 17-50mm makes for a nice kit.
Everything that should come with the camera seems to be included, and the filters, memory card and remote control sweeten the deal.
If this user has good feedback history, go for it.

Mandy asks…
What is the best affordable beginner D-SLR camera, in your opinion?
I am very interested in purchasing a digital SLR camera to learn with. I am applying for a photography class at tafe and it requires a DSLR and i dont know what i should get? I am mainly looking at Canon and Nikon.
So my questions:
1) What would you say is the best one for a beginner?
2) If I see a good price on a Camera body alone, should I take it and then invest on a good lens or start off with a kit?
3) what is a good price range to start out with ?
4) would you go second hand or only buy new ?
please help ….
rob answers:
1. I would say canon 1000d – entry level dslr, everything you need to learn.
2. Yes defininitly, coz the lenses is what most important (not the body)
3.the entry level dslrs are about 350-400 (new) or 200-300 (used ebay)
4.i would probably buy a new body but 2nd hand lenses, (everyone usually keeps their lens safe and clean)
i always look for 2nd hand lenses on ebay and they are great….BUT i would suggest new body (just incase )

Ken asks…
What is a good SLR camera that fits these descriptions?
So, I’ve been thinking about getting an SLR camera. I looked online, I went to Best Buy, but I still don’t know which one to buy. Money is not a problem (as long as it’s under $900).
I found interest in the Nikon D5000, and then I heard that the Nikon D90 is better (even though they are both 12.3 mega pixels). I compared the two & saw that the Nikon D90 is sufficiently smaller, but I like big cameras, so I chose the D5000 over the D90. Is the D90 actually better?
Then I heard about the Canon EOS Digital Rebel T1i. It’s about $800 & it’s 15.10 mega pixels. But I am leaning more toward Nikon because my friend whose uncle is a pro-photographer says Nikon is better in quality. I still don’t know what to choose.
Here are my requirements if you know/have a good camera:
1) Very good quality (over 12-13 mega pixels).
2) Not small. Fairly big enough to cover eyes, nose, & mouth (but not too heavy).
3) Easy to choose with lots of good modes & features.
I also heard that you only get the body when you buy an SLR.. Is this true? If so, what lens should I get with it?
THANK YOU!
When I said better quality, I meant the camera itself. And I actually DO know what those features are because I take an advanced photography at school and used to model/take pictures.
rob answers:
Hey,
Your friends pro photo uncle is not correct. Nikon doesn’t have better image quality, nor does Canon or any other brand. How does he know? Did he do tests? Even if he did, there are different models with different sensors and these are important. Lenses too!
Megapixels. If it’s more than 8 megapixels, it’s alright; if you wanna print and look at photos on your monitor. More megapixels doesn’t mean better image quality, sharpness or more realistic photos. I could show you 2 photos from a 6MP and 12MP camera and you wouldn’t see any difference (except when looking at 100%).
The D90 is smaller than the D5000? I doubt it..because the D90 is more advanced, so body should be bigger than the D5000.
Take a look at this article, it talks about Which DSLR to buy, what’s important, what’s not, features, megapixels etc. Here is the link: http://the-digital-photographer.blogspot.com/2009/11/what-dslr-should-i-buy.html
There are two options: Body or Body+Kit Lens (which, at lower cameras, is not such a great lens when it comes to optical quality.

William asks…
A battle between Nikon and Canon (ok, Olympus too…)?
So I’ve ditched my point-and-shoot Sony Cybershot, and I’m currently left with the 2 MP camera on my phone. I am looking into entering the DSLR realm, and I’ve been intensely researching the pros and cons of both Nikon and Canon. I’ve looked at the Pen series of Olympus, but the quality brings back awful memories of the Cybershot.
Now, I know it is the lens of the camera that really matters. But the body of the camera does too, if you’re looking for those quality pictures.
MP does not matter to me – the quality of the pictures do. They must be clear and crisp. Compare the two below:
* http://gallery.photographyreview.com/images/reviews/sony_TX5/sony-tx5_ISO400.jpg – I really hate the haziness of these photos. My Cybershot made a few crisp images before, but most pictures ended up like this, especially in low light situations. Sigh.. ISO…
vs.
* http://www.theis.dk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/sample_l.jpg – Subject in the photo appears brilliant despite the low-light situation (probably used a flash)
* http://www.nikon-image.com/products/camera/ slr / digital /d80/img/sample/pic_003.jpg – The front half of the subject’s head is in clear, crisp focus. But it quickly blurs towards the back of her head.
My total budget is around $1,000.
I want to take brilliant landscapes with HDR imaging, be able to take brilliant wedding photos (as best as possible using equipment within that budget), and memorable portrait images.
Would the lens of Nikon or Canon be suitable for these tasks? Should I just get the body and buy lens separately or start with a kit (which usually comes with 18-55mm lens)? Is the 18-55 “good” enough if I can only carry one lens?
And what’s the deal with Nikon bringing out two new cameras this month? Are we expecting updates from Canon very soon?
(Also, what is the difference between crop and conversion?)

rob answers:
That’s quite a few question you’ve asked
. Let me try to cover some.
Nikon vs Canon?
If you are starting out, there’s really not much difference between the two and it sometimes comes down to personal preferences. The ergonomics of the two is slightly different and if this bothers you, the only way to settle the issue is for you to try out both camera and see which suits you better.
It used to be the case that people use Nikons for studio and wedding shoots, and Canon for sports. However, both brands have come to a point where they perform very well in all areas. You just need to choose the correct accessories and lens.
If you want to get a near perfect system for your budget, it is best to pick and choose. To do this, you *must* know your requirements. The cost will be higher than a kit. The 18-55mm is a kit lens and is reasonably good for general purpose use. You may want to get this first and then decide, based on your shooting preference, what your next lens should be.
Picture/Image Quality
The last image you posted (Nikon) was shot with a Nikon D80 with a 85mm F/1.4 lens. The aperture used was f2.8 which is why you get the good bokeh (blurring effect). The IQ (image quality) of the lens is contributes to the sharpness and colour saturation. This is a prime lens (meaning fix focal length). The benefit of prime is they give very good IQ but I would not suggest getting this type of lens unless you know what are the limitations they have in composition.
New models
Both Canon and Nikon roll out new models regularly to refresh their model lines. The approx age of each model is around 18-24 months – give or take a few months. They will introduce new technical features here and there to keep the buyers busy. It is not necessary true that newer bodies will give better IQ. Going back to the Nikon image which you liked, the camera body the D80 was launched in 2006.
Cropped vs conversion
Cropped refers to the reduced sensor size (compared to the film size of 35 mm SLR cameras) found in most DSLR. The size of a 35 mm film is called ‘full frame’ and there are DSLR which use FF sensors. Most ‘crop’ is 1.5 or 1.6. This means that the full frame sensor is 1.5 / 1.6 times larger than that of the DSLR sensor. The DSLR sensor will capture a smaller portion of the picture compared with that of a FF.
Because of this, lens used in the DSLR with cropped sensors will not show the similar perspective as that of FF sensor. That’s where conversion comes in. Conversion refers to the ‘equivalent’ focal length for cropped sensor camera. So if you are using a 50 mm focal length, the conversion factor in a cropped sensor lens will show an image as if it was taken by a 80mm (1.6 x 50mm) lens on a FF camera.
If you do not use FF or is particular of this, this should bother you the least in the choice of camera. FF DSLRs are in the semi-pro to pro category and they are expensive.
Powered by Yahoo! Answers
Filed under: Canon Digital SLR Reviews
Like this post? Subscribe to my RSS feed and get loads more!